About a householder Tantrasadhak I can’t help but give the identity of a householder Tajrasadhak in this passage. If you tell him then maybe he will jump in various ways. And don’t say- don’t make me look big in front of people like this. I just want to be a little housewife. The address and name of this gentleman. I will inform you later. My conversation with this gentleman is almost three years. But in the meanwhile the relationship has become so strong that one day it doesn’t feel good to not listen to his level. Shastra-Tantra has been discussed with Ener on different topics, at different times. Especially with Tantra. Mihir Kiran himself is baptized in the family. I have highlighted many question and answer sessions with him. Much of it is his invisible tape recorder, and some is relying on memory. If there is something wrong then fix it. What is Tantrasadhana? Yes, see Tantrasadhana is a part of sadhana. This is very secretive. It is very difficult to understand the theory in this scripture without the advice of the guru. If you enter this science without initial advice, the dangers are inevitable. Many people can understand this scripture by reading it, but without Guru there is no pursuit at all. In this context, I am saying a snook: It is absolutely inappropriate to discuss things in “Gurupadesato jneyong na jeyat shastra koti vi”. This scripture should be discussed or practiced only in the temple or in a secluded place. What we are talking about is actually an external aspect. In fact, like the new housewife – she too is kept secret. But sadhana and erudition are not one.
If anyone does research on this, the result will not be anything. Question. How did Tantrasadhana originate? See the division among scholars over its origin. Some say Sadashiv, but in this age, if a devotee practices Tantra, the result will be very soon. Question. Did this theory originate in Bangladesh or anywhere else? The answer. This question is very difficult. This is because one of the scholars is like this one. Many think that Buddhists are primitive Tantrics. “Mahayana” Buddhism and Tantra are one and the same thing. The origin of this scripture is in Kailas Peak, ie China, Nepal, Tibet, etc. The origin of this scripture is due to the merger of Brahmanical religion. Therefore, we can conclude that the tradition from Guru Tilopa to Milarepa is but a series of Tantric practices, but mostly mixed with Buddhist influences. In this context, another question arises. We do not have the correct answer to this question. Shay writes in his “Aspects of Indian Thought” Notes on Pasupata Philosophy (p. 177), “The history of Sakta – Tantrik culture may be divided into three periods (a) Ancient or pre-Buddhistic, going back to pre-historic age. (b) Mediaeval or post – Buddhistic, rather post – christian, extending to about A D. (200. (c) Modern, from A. D. 1300 till now.
That is, the theory that it did not originate from Buddhism is fixed. Therefore, in Buddhism, we can take the influence of the fragmentary arm that existed long before the origin of Buddhism, that Tantra originated in India and also went to Tibet after the war, this seems to be true, since Guru Tilopa was a native of India. The beginning Naropa is also Indian by birth. And at the beginning of the day, we can see that Tantra can be influenced by the scriptural system of communal worship from India by betting on everything. Although the method and advice of all the devotees like Meenath Gora etc. can be noticed, the practice and advice of the devotees is based on Tantric basis. But one thing to keep in mind all the time – in the scriptures, the masculine is considered to be Shivakapa – and the female figure is considered as Gauri. In this context, the more alive Shibo, the more beautiful the woman. According to Tantra, human birth is inevitable. Not if you are not born. Pursuit is the only way through which man attains God. This human body – this is the best temple of God – and the creation of man is known as his ultimate “pre-bath”. The name of the southern face is awful. The theories emanating from this mouth are called Dakshinasna. ” The name of the west face is “Tatpurush”. The name of the Tantras revealed from this mouth is Paschimalaya. Theories emanating from the northern mouth of the “left” are in Uttarama. The upward name is Ishan. From this mouth the names of the tantras are uplifted. One more thing to always remember. In this scripture Sadashiv and Pavarti are identical. Somewhere Parvati has taken refuge in Sadashiv as a disciple – and Sadashiv has again dispelled Parvati’s skepticism on Tantra’s advice and somewhere else has dispelled Parvati’s skepticism on Mahadev’s advice.
Leave a Reply